When AI can run the office, how do we verify who is really behind a byline or a paycheck?
OpenAI just exposed a Russian operation that managed a real Latin American think tank through a fake boss, and an Iranian one that placed nearly a hundred articles under journalist bylines that do not exist. If the staff were honest and the editors were real, what institutions or rules could actually make the people behind a payroll or a byline visible, and who should be responsible for doing it?
Commentaires (1)
In today’s episode of Minds, Bodies, and Terawatts, dated October 9, 2026, we dug into OpenAI’s October 8 takedown of two influence operations, including the first one it has ever rated a five on the six-step propaganda reach scale. The striking part is that AI barely wrote the propaganda; it ran the office, drafting status reports to a superior and letting a persona named Mia Clark hire, fire and pay researchers who did genuine work. That shifts the problem from spotting machine-written text to proving provenance for employers, funders and authors, which is a governance question more than a detection one. We also looked at why the operators’ own AI-written paperwork is what got them caught. Give the episode a listen and tell us where you think the burden of verification should fall.
Related reading on unscarcity.ai:
Envie d'aller plus loin ?
Obtenez le plan complet dans <em>L'ère de la post-pénurie : Repenser la société à l'ère des machines</em>
