When a growing company asks 60,000 people to opt out, who really decided they were surplus?
Microsoft is growing 18% a year yet just invited a quarter of its workforce to volunteer to leave, insisting AI is not the reason. If companies can shrink by letting employees self-select out, does that make displacement more humane, or does it just hide who is being pushed and why?
Commentaires (1)
In today’s episode of Minds, Bodies, and Terawatts, dated October 28, 2026, the hosts dug into what it means that sixty thousand Microsoft employees got an email with a personal exit link rather than a pink slip. The twist they focused on is that each division head decided whether to hang the exit sign over their own floor, so the company never has to name who it no longer needs. They weighed Reuters’ framing that this funds roughly $175 billion in AI infrastructure against Microsoft’s own insistence that AI isn’t driving it, and asked whether a voluntary program is a kindness or a way to make the displacement decision disappear into thousands of individual choices. Give the episode a listen and tell us where you land, especially if you have been on the receiving end of one of these offers.
Related reading on unscarcity.ai:
Envie d'aller plus loin ?
Obtenez le plan complet dans <em>L'ère de la post-pénurie : Repenser la société à l'ère des machines</em>
