Sign in for free: Preamble (PDF, ebook & audiobook) + Forum access + Direct purchases Sign In

Unscarcity Research

"The 2025-2030 Labor Cliff: How AI is Reshaping Work at Unprecedented Speed"

"The convergence of mass layoffs, AI automation, and technological displacement is creating the most significant labor market transformation in history. Here's what the data shows and what it means for your future."

11 min read 2453 words /a/labor-cliff-2025-2030

Note: This is a research note supplementing the book Unscarcity, now available for purchase. These notes expand on concepts from the main text. Start here or get the book.

The 2025-2030 Labor Cliff: The Great Unbundling of Human Work

Here’s a fun thought experiment: Imagine explaining to a Medieval peasant that one day, machines would do all the farming, and 97% of people would have to find something else to do. They’d probably ask, “Then who eats?”

We’re that peasant now. Except instead of tractors replacing farm hands over 200 years, it’s AI replacing knowledge workers over ten. And unlike the peasant, we have spreadsheets, so we can watch it happen in real time.

The numbers arrived in December 2025. They’re not good.


The Crime Scene: 1.17 Million and Counting

Through November 2025, U.S. employers announced 1.17 million layoffs—the highest year-to-date total since the COVID apocalypse of 2020, and the sixth time since 1993 that we’ve crossed the million-layoff mark before Thanksgiving.

Let that sink in. We’re not in a recession. GDP is positive. Inflation is cooling. Corporate profits are at record highs. And companies are firing workers at pandemic-era rates.

Why? Because they’re not cutting costs. They’re substituting labor. Every company announcing layoffs is simultaneously announcing billions in AI investment. Microsoft cuts 15,000 workers and invests $80 billion in AI infrastructure. Meta fires 4,200 people and redirects the savings to training Llama. Amazon eliminates 14,000 corporate jobs—the single largest corporate layoff of 2025—while doubling down on AWS AI services.

The euphemism is “restructuring.” The reality is replacement.

The Challenger Report: Reading Between the Lines

Challenger, Gray & Christmas tracks layoff announcements like a coroner tracks causes of death. Here’s what they found:

Metric Figure Translation
Total 2025 layoffs (through Nov) 1,170,821 54% higher than 2024
October 2025 alone 153,074 Highest October in 22 years
November 2025 71,321 “Slowing down” (still massive)
#1 reason cited DOGE impact 293,753 jobs
#2 reason cited Economic conditions 245,086 jobs
#6 reason cited AI 54,694 jobs

Notice that AI ranks sixth as a stated reason. But look at what ranks above it: “restructuring,” “economic conditions,” “closings.” What do you think companies are restructuring toward? They’re not rebuilding their org charts to hire more humans.

The stated reason and the real reason are doing a complicated dance. Companies say “efficiency.” They mean “algorithms.”

Source: CNBC, The Hill


Tech Sector: Ground Zero

If you want to see the future of all white-collar work, watch what’s happening in tech. The sector that was supposed to be immune to automation is getting automated first.

The Hall of Layoffs (2025)

Company Layoffs What They’re Building Instead
Intel 21,000+ (~20% of workforce) AI chips
Microsoft ~15,000 Copilot, OpenAI partnership
Amazon 14,000 corporate AWS AI services
IBM 8,000-9,000 AI replacing HR and admin
Meta 4,200+ Llama, AI advertising
Verizon 13,000+ Network automation

Different trackers give slightly different totals—TrueUp says 182,963 tech workers across 626 layoff events; TechCrunch counts 126,101+ at U.S.-based companies; Crunchbase has similar figures. The variation comes from who counts as “tech” (is Amazon a tech company or a logistics company with a tech problem?).

But every tracker agrees on the direction: up.

The irony is thick enough to cut: the people who built the machines are being replaced by the machines they built. Microsoft’s Copilot now writes 46% of all code where it’s deployed—up from 27% when it launched in 2022. For Java developers, that figure hits 61%. The humans aren’t collaborating with AI; they’re being outpaced by it.

Source: TechCrunch, Fortune


The BLS Numbers: A 4.6% Unemployment Rate That Lies

On December 16, 2025, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its delayed November employment report (thanks, government shutdown). The headline: 4.6% unemployment.

That sounds fine. It’s not fine.

What the Numbers Actually Show

Metric Rate What It Means
Overall unemployment 4.6% Highest since 2021
Jobs added (November) +64,000 Below replacement rate
Jobs lost (October) -105,000 First loss since pandemic
Adult men unemployment 4.2% Rising
Adult women unemployment 4.4% Rising faster
Teenagers (16-19) ~13.5% The future isn’t working
Labor force participation 62.3% 37.7% have stopped looking

That October loss of 105,000 jobs—partly due to federal workers taking deferred resignation offers—is the first net monthly job loss since the pandemic recovery. The economy isn’t creating enough jobs to keep up with population growth, let alone absorb the displaced.

And wage growth? Slowed to 3.5% year-over-year. In an economy where AI-driven productivity is supposedly making us all richer, workers are getting a shrinking share of the gains.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bloomberg


The AI Acceleration: This Isn’t Your Father’s Automation

Here’s what makes this different from every previous economic disruption: speed and scope.

The GitHub Copilot Reality Check

Software development is the canary in the cognitive coal mine. If AI can automate programming—the thing we told everyone to learn because “robots can’t code”—what’s safe?

Metric Figure Source
Code written by Copilot (where enabled) 46% Tenet
Java code written by Copilot 61% GitHub
Code suggestions kept in final submissions 88% GitHub
Task completion speed increase 55% faster GitHub Research
Developers using Copilot 15+ million GitHub (early 2025)
Fortune 100 adoption 90% GitHub

Read that again: nearly half of all code in Copilot-enabled environments is written by the AI. Developers accept 88% of its suggestions. They complete tasks 55% faster.

This isn’t “assistance.” This is replacement happening in slow motion—except it’s not slow, it’s just visible enough that we haven’t panicked yet.

Source: GitHub Blog, Second Talent

McKinsey’s 30% Warning

McKinsey Global Institute—not exactly a fringe operation—projects that by 2030:

Scenario Hours Automated Workers Needing Career Changes
Without generative AI 21.5% ~8 million
With generative AI 29.5% 12 million

That’s an 8 percentage-point acceleration just from generative AI. Eight percent of all work hours in America. Gone. Not “transformed”—gone.

The 12 million workers who need to switch careers by 2030 is 25% more than McKinsey projected just two years ago. And the biggest shift? STEM professionals—the people we told to “learn to code”—face automation potential jumping from 14% to 30% of work hours.

The advice to “get a tech job” is now about as useful as “get a factory job” was in 1975.

Source: McKinsey Global Institute, Fortune

Goldman Sachs: 300 Million Jobs Exposed

Goldman Sachs economists estimate that 300 million full-time jobs globally could be exposed to AI automation:

  • Two-thirds of jobs in the US and Europe face some AI exposure
  • 7% of jobs could be entirely replaced
  • 63% of jobs will be “complemented” (read: fundamentally changed)
  • 30% of jobs remain unaffected (for now)

The optimistic spin: AI could increase global GDP by 7% over the next decade. The pessimistic reality: that GDP will be concentrated among those who own the AI systems, not those displaced by them.

Source: Goldman Sachs


The DOGE Effect: Government as Preview

Remember when people joked about making government “run like a business”? Well, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is delivering on that joke—and the punchline is 293,753 federal and contractor jobs.

DOGE-related cuts are now the #1 cited reason for layoffs in 2025. Federal contractors are preemptively reducing headcount before contracts get cancelled. Non-profits dependent on government funding are shuttering programs. The ripple effects are hitting sectors that weren’t even on the automation radar.

March 2025 alone saw 275,240 announced job cuts, with 216,670 directly attributed to DOGE actions. That’s not automation—that’s ideology with a spreadsheet. But it’s creating the same outcome: millions of workers discovering that their jobs were more expendable than they thought.

Source: Challenger, Gray & Christmas


Why This Time Really Is Different

Every time someone cries “automation apocalypse,” skeptics point to history: the Luddites were wrong, the Industrial Revolution created more jobs than it destroyed, ATMs didn’t eliminate bank tellers. Why should AI be different?

Here’s why:

1. Speed

Era Disruption Adaptation Time
Industrial Revolution Mechanization ~60 years
Electrification Factory automation ~40 years
Computing Digital transformation ~30 years
AI Era (2020s) Cognitive automation ~10 years

Previous disruptions gave humans generations to adapt. Factories didn’t appear overnight; children grew up knowing their skills would be obsolete. AI capability doubles roughly annually. Humans don’t evolve that fast.

2. Target

Every previous disruption attacked manual labor first, giving cognitive workers time to climb the skill ladder. AI is eating cognitive labor first. The lawyers, accountants, programmers, and analysts are getting hit before the plumbers and electricians.

That’s not a ladder to climb—that’s the ladder being pulled up.

3. Scope

The Luddites destroyed textile looms. AI writes code, diagnoses diseases, generates marketing copy, handles customer service, trades stocks, drafts legal documents, and composes music. It’s not one industry. It’s every industry that involves information work.

4. The Skills Gap Is a Chasm

New AI-related jobs require credentials most displaced workers don’t have:

Requirement % of New AI Jobs % of US Adults
Master’s degree 77% 13%
Doctoral degree 18% 4%
Bachelor’s or less 5% 83%

We’re creating jobs that 95% of displaced workers cannot fill. “Just retrain” might as well be “just become a different person.”


The Vision: What Happens Next?

Elon Musk’s Bet

The tech leaders aren’t hiding what’s coming. Elon Musk has repeatedly predicted:

  • “Universal High Income” (not just basic income) will become necessary
  • Work will become optional within 10-20 years
  • Money itself may become “irrelevant” as AI creates abundance
  • He gives this an 80% probability

This isn’t poverty prevention—it’s a complete reimagining of economics. Musk’s philosophical challenge: “If the computer and robots can do everything better than you, does your life have meaning?”

His answer: work becomes voluntary, like “playing sports or a video game.” You do it because you want to, not because you’ll starve if you don’t.

Source: Fortune

The Unscarcity Framework

In the Unscarcity framework, the Labor Cliff isn’t a catastrophe—it’s the problem statement for the next civilization.

The solution isn’t more job training programs (though those help at the margins). It’s recognizing that an economy built on human labor is becoming obsolete, and building new systems that decouple survival from employment.

That’s what the Abundant Foundation and Impact Points accomplish: a two-tier system where everyone gets to exist (Tier 1 Residency through the Foundation), and those who want to contribute earn influence through Impact—a decaying currency that prevents oligarchy while still giving humans mountains to climb.

The choice we face isn’t “jobs vs. no jobs.” It’s “Star Wars” (elite capture of abundance technology) vs. “Star Trek” (abundance as infrastructure for all).

The 2025-2030 Labor Cliff is the gap between where we are and where we need to be. The question is whether we’ll build bridges or fall into the chasm.


What This Means for You

Immediate (2025-2026)

  1. Assume your job will change fundamentally. Not “might”—will. Even if you’re not fired, your role in 2027 will look nothing like your role today.
  2. Learn to direct AI, not compete with it. The skill isn’t “doing the task better than AI.” It’s “knowing which tasks to give AI and how to verify the output.”
  3. Document your unique value. Complex emotional intelligence, creative problem-solving across domains, ethical judgment—these are still human advantages. For now.

Medium-term (2026-2028)

  1. Diversify income streams. One employer is a single point of failure in a volatile labor market.
  2. Build human networks. AI can’t yet replace trust relationships. Your network is your safety net.
  3. Consider geographic flexibility. Some regions will adapt faster than others.

Long-term (2028-2030)

  1. Redefine purpose. If work becomes optional, what gives your life meaning? Start answering that question now.
  2. Advocate for transition infrastructure. Support discussions about abundance frameworks, retraining programs, and economic transformation.
  3. Create rather than compete. Focus on uniquely human endeavors—art, connection, stewardship.

The Uncomfortable Truth

The companies laying off thousands while posting record profits aren’t being cruel. They’re adapting to a new reality where human cognitive labor is increasingly obsolete. You can be angry about it—anger is appropriate—but anger won’t change the thermodynamics.

What will change things is building new systems before the old ones collapse.

The 2025-2030 period isn’t just another economic cycle. It’s the Labor Cliff—the moment human work as we’ve known it begins its permanent transformation. Those who recognize this and adapt will navigate the transition. Those who don’t will become statistics.

The numbers are screaming. Are you listening?


Sources and References

Labor Market Reports

Tech Layoff Tracking

AI and Automation Research

Universal High Income and Future Visions

DOGE and Government Impact



Last updated: December 17, 2025

The cliff doesn’t wait for stragglers.

Share this article: