Unscarcity Notes

Time Banking Economics: From Volunteer Hours to Merit Currency

Time Banking Economics: From Volunteer Hours to Merit Currency How communities exchange time as currency—and what this means for post-scarcity coordination --- How Time Banks Work Today Time...

17 min read 3868 words /a/time-banking-economics

Time Banking Economics: From Volunteer Hours to Merit Currency

How communities exchange time as currency—and what this means for post-scarcity coordination

How Time Banks Work Today

Time banking is an economic model centered on a deceptively simple premise: one hour of your time equals one hour of anyone else’s time. A lawyer’s hour is worth exactly as much as a plumber’s hour, a teenager’s tutoring session is equal to an elderly neighbor’s gardening help. This radical egalitarianism challenges the fundamental assumption of market economies—that skills have inherently different values.

The concept was formalized in 1980 by Edgar Cahn, an American attorney and former speech writer for Robert F. Kennedy, who developed the system after a near-fatal heart attack prompted him to reconsider how communities value contribution. Cahn designed time banking as a response to Ronald Reagan’s withdrawal of funding for social programs, creating a medium of exchange that encouraged and rewarded work needed to build strong communities—work that market economies consistently undervalue or ignore entirely.

The Mechanics

In a time bank:

  1. Members register their skills—everything from cooking to carpentry, language teaching to legal advice, pet sitting to plumbing.
  2. When you help someone, you earn time credits at a rate of one credit per hour.
  3. When you need help, you spend credits to receive services from other members.
  4. A coordinator (often called a “time broker”) matches requests with offers and tracks balances.

Unlike traditional volunteer work, time banking creates genuine reciprocity. You’re not just giving—you’re building a balance that entitles you to receive. This transforms charity into exchange, dependency into interdependence.

Five Core Principles

Cahn formulated five principles guiding time banks:

  1. Everyone has something to contribute — No one is merely a recipient
  2. Volunteering is work — Care, support, and community-building deserve recognition
  3. Reciprocity drives engagement — Helping and being helped creates sustainable relationships
  4. Community building matters — Social networks have inherent value
  5. Mutual accountability — Respect flows in all directions

Global Scale Today

The time banking movement has grown substantially since Cahn’s initial experiments:

  • Worldwide: More than 1,000 operational time banks across 34+ countries, with over 500,000 members exchanging more than 4 million documented hours of service
  • United States: ~500 registered time banks with approximately 37,000-40,000 members
  • United Kingdom: ~300 time banks with 32,000 members; Timebanking UK reported over 2 million time credits exchanged by 2014
  • hOurworld Network: Over 400 time banks with 35,000+ members across 39 countries, operating as the largest active time banking system on the planet

The true scope is likely larger—survey data indicates that at least 50% of time bank members do not regularly record their hours of service.

Success Stories

Time banking has produced remarkable outcomes when properly implemented. These case studies demonstrate the model’s potential across diverse contexts.

Japan’s Fureai Kippu: The 50-Year Pioneer

Japan’s Fureai Kippu (“Ticket for a Caring Relationship”) represents perhaps the most sophisticated and successful time banking implementation in the world. Created in 1994-1995 by Tsutomu Hotta, former attorney general and minister of justice, the system was built on foundations laid by Teruko Mizushima’s Volunteer Labour Bank, established in Osaka in 1973.

Scale and Structure:

  • 374 organizations participate in the Fureai Kippu network
  • Each organization includes 200-300 members
  • The largest branch, Nippon Active Life Club, has 37,500 members across 137 regional centers
  • Approximately 100,000 people benefit from services

Key Innovation—Transferability:
The Fureai Kippu system allows credits to be transferred geographically. A daughter in Tokyo can earn hours helping elderly neighbors, then transfer those credits to her aging mother in Osaka, who can “spend” them receiving care. This solves the geographic fragmentation problem that plagues most time banks.

A Remarkable Finding:
Research revealed that elderly recipients actually prefer services from people paid in Fureai Kippu over those paid in yen. When surveyed, they cited the quality of the personal relationship—people who come for time credits come because they chose this form of compensation, not because they needed money. The intrinsic motivation creates better care.

Madison Youth Court: Criminal Justice Reimagined

The TimeBank Youth Court in Madison, Wisconsin demonstrates time banking’s potential beyond simple service exchange. The program gives teenagers who commit minor offenses an alternative to the official criminal justice system.

How It Works:

  • Police refer young offenders to Youth Court instead of issuing tickets
  • A jury of teenage peers hears the case
  • Sentences can include apologies, restitution, or community service
  • The program draws on time bank resources to develop creative sentencing options

Results:
Between 2009 and 2010, the number of police tickets issued to students at one high school dropped from 126 to 26—a nearly 80% reduction. Minor offenses no longer trigger out-of-school suspensions or arrest records that follow young people for life.

Clapham Park Time Bank: Mental Health and Community

In South London’s Clapham Park estate—an area with high unemployment, mental health challenges, and significant diversity (35% White British, 19% White Other, 18% Black African, 12% Black Caribbean)—the South London & Maudsley Foundation Trust established a time bank in 2004 to promote residents’ mental wellbeing.

Results:

  • 708 residents participated since inception
  • Over 5,000 hours exchanged
  • Activities expanded to include a community safety network, library, healthy living project, and theatre program
  • Research found that two-thirds of participants who became more active reported mental health gains

Hour Exchange Portland: 25+ Years Running

Founded in 1997 in Portland, Maine, Hour Exchange Portland demonstrates time banking’s sustainability:

  • Over 900 members currently active
  • More than 150,000 hours of service exchanged since founding
  • Continuous operation for over 25 years

Stiftung Zeitvorsorge: Swiss Retirement Innovation

St. Gallen, Switzerland’s Foundation Time Care (Stiftung Zeitvorsorge), founded in 2011, represents an innovative approach to aging societies:

  • 320 members (limited to those over 50)
  • More than 80,000 hours banked
  • Services include errands, grocery shopping, medical appointments, and companionship
  • Hours can be “saved” for members’ own future care needs

Switzerland has gone further than any nation in institutionalizing time banking. In 2020, the Swiss government partnered with nonprofit Pro Senectute to launch a national time banking program, with government legislation explicitly supporting the system as part of addressing an aging population.

Five London Time Banks: £3 Million Social Value

A social evaluation project conducted with the City of London and City Bridge assessed five London time banks and found they achieved a combined social value figure of over £3 million. This quantifies what participants experience qualitatively: time banking generates real economic value that doesn’t appear in GDP statistics.

Failure Patterns

Understanding why time banks fail is as important as celebrating successes. Research has identified consistent patterns of decline and collapse.

The Founder Dependency Problem: Ithaca HOURS

Ithaca HOURS, launched by Paul Glover in November 1991 in Ithaca, New York, became the most famous local currency experiment in America. At its peak:

  • Over $100,000 worth of HOURS in circulation
  • 2,000 participants from a population of 100,000
  • 500+ accepting businesses
  • $110,000 issued since inception, millions in exchanges
  • 11% of hours issued as grants to community organizations

Yet Ithaca HOURS has declined significantly. The primary causes:

  1. Founder Departure: When Paul Glover moved away, he took with him the evangelical energy and networking that kept the system vibrant. Glover himself noted that “every local currency needs at least one full-time networker to ‘promote, facilitate and troubleshoot’ currency circulation.”

  2. Technology Shift: The general shift from cash to electronic payments (debit/credit cards) made physical currency increasingly inconvenient.

  3. Lack of Institutional Transition: The charismatic founder model never evolved into sustainable organizational structure.

The Funding Cliff: Gorbals Time Bank

The Gorbals Time Bank in Glasgow, Scotland operated in an inner-city estate characterized by high deprivation, poverty, unemployment, poor health, and low educational attainment. Under Dr. Gill Seyfang’s study in 2004:

  • Two associated local time banks employed paid time-brokers
  • The system proved successful for three years
  • Activities expanded to include community safety networks, libraries, healthy living projects, and theatre programs

Then funding disappeared. Without resources to pay the time-broker coordinators, the time banks ended entirely. The Gorbals experiment demonstrates a cruel irony: systems designed to operate without money often require money to coordinate.

The Long-Term Care Insurance Effect: Japan

Even Japan’s sophisticated Fureai Kippu system faced unexpected headwinds. The implementation of Japan’s Long-Term Care Insurance Act in 2000 significantly stunted growth, as many users preferred state-provided services over voluntary time bank options. When a government alternative exists, some members choose the path of least friction—even if time bank services were qualitatively better.

The Critical Mass Problem

Research consistently shows time banks “fail to achieve and retain the critical mass of people to show continuous commitment and long-term engagement.” Unlike social media platforms that can grow virally, time banks require sustained local relationship-building that doesn’t scale easily.

The Aging Membership Problem

Multiple studies document a pattern of “creeping decline”: time banks fail to rejuvenate their member base. As founding members age, younger participants don’t join at replacement rates. The membership base ages faster than the general population, until the organization becomes a group of elderly volunteers helping each other—sustainable for a while, but not indefinitely.

The Help-Seeking Stigma

Research highlights a profound psychological barrier: participants “have difficulty asking for help.” Studies show that even children as young as seven consider asking for assistance a negative act, viewing it as a reflection of inability or incompetence. Time banks require both giving and receiving, but cultural conditioning makes receiving feel shameful.

The Coordinator Burnout Problem

Time bank organizers face a fundamental tension: the role requires consistent administrative input but doesn’t reward them financially. The risk of “managerial incompetence or corruption” exists, but more common is simple burnout. Passionate founders eventually tire. Volunteer coordinators have limits on sustainable commitment.

Scaling Challenges

Time banking faces structural obstacles that have prevented it from achieving the transformative scale its advocates envision.

The Network Effect Deficit

Traditional platforms like social media benefit from powerful network effects: each new user makes the platform more valuable for all existing users. Time banks have weaker network effects for several reasons:

  1. Geographic Constraints: Most time bank exchanges happen locally—you can’t receive gardening help from someone 500 miles away. This limits the network’s effective size.

  2. Skill Matching Friction: Unlike money, which is universally acceptable, time credits depend on having members who offer what you need and want what you offer. A 500-person time bank might have no one who can fix your car.

  3. Trust Requirements: Financial transactions can occur between strangers. Time banking invites people into your home, to care for your children, to handle your possessions. Trust-building takes time and limits expansion speed.

The Technology Gap

Time banking at significant scale requires sophisticated technology for:

  • Storing member profiles and skill inventories
  • Matching supply and demand
  • Tracking credits and exchanges
  • Communicating between members

Yet most time banks operate with limited technical resources. The technology platforms that exist (hOurworld’s Time and Talents, Timebanking UK’s Community Weaver) work well but lack the polish and network effects of commercial platforms.

The Volunteer Management Paradox

Time banks that remain purely volunteer-run stay small. Time banks that hire paid coordinators need funding. Funding often comes with strings attached or eventually runs out. This creates a sustainability paradox with no clean solution.

The Specialization Problem

Market economies excel at encouraging specialization—people develop deep expertise because they’re well-compensated. Time banks value all hours equally, which removes financial incentives for developing specialized skills. Why spend 10 years becoming an expert plumber if your hour is worth the same as a novice’s?

This isn’t a problem for many services (companionship, basic errands, simple tasks), but it limits time banking’s ability to coordinate highly specialized labor.

The Scale Reality

As the Stanford Social Innovation Review noted: “At its current scale, time banking cannot solve major social and environmental problems.” Despite four decades of development, time banking remains what journalist Susan Dentzer called in 2002 either “a concept whose time was coming—or merely a fringe idea.” The jury remains out.

Integration with Merit System

Time banking provides crucial empirical evidence for the Unscarcity Project’s Merit System design. The successes and failures of time banks over 50+ years offer a roadmap for what works and what doesn’t when humans coordinate contribution outside market mechanisms.

What Time Banks Prove Is Possible

  1. People Will Contribute Without Money: Millions of hours exchanged prove that properly designed systems can elicit contribution without cash compensation. The “homo economicus” model—humans as purely self-interested rational actors—fails to explain time bank participation.

  2. Equal Valuation Can Work: Despite economists’ predictions that no one would provide high-skill services for the same “payment” as low-skill work, time banks successfully facilitated such exchanges. Lawyers helped neighbors. Doctors volunteered. The intrinsic satisfaction of contribution plus community recognition proved sufficient motivation.

  3. Reciprocity Engages More Than Charity: Time banks consistently outperform traditional volunteer programs in sustained engagement. The ability to receive, not just give, transforms the psychology of participation.

  4. Care Work Can Be Coordinated: Services that markets undervalue—elder care, childcare, community support, companionship—flourish in time bank environments. This matters enormously for post-scarcity design.

What Time Banks Reveal as Challenges

  1. Coordination Costs Are Real: Every successful time bank requires active coordination. This labor has to come from somewhere. The Merit System must account for coordination as valuable contribution, not invisible overhead.

  2. Trust Doesn’t Scale Automatically: Small time banks work because members know each other. Larger systems require formal trust mechanisms—verification, reputation systems, accountability structures—that add complexity.

  3. Geographic Fragmentation Limits Value: The Fureai Kippu innovation of transferable credits solves this partially. A digital, global Merit System could solve it fully.

  4. Specialization Incentives Matter: Equal valuation works for general services but creates problems for highly specialized labor. The 90/10 Framework’s distinction between Baseline (where equal contribution recognition works) and Frontier (where differential recognition may be needed) maps directly onto this lesson.

  5. Technology Is Necessary Infrastructure: Modern time banking “would not be possible without computer technology.” Any Merit System must be digitally native, with sophisticated matching, tracking, and reputation algorithms.

Design Principles for Merit Integration

Drawing from time bank experience, a Merit System should incorporate:

From Success Patterns:

  • Explicit reciprocity mechanisms (not just one-way giving)
  • Transferability of credits (like Fureai Kippu’s geographic transfers)
  • Local coordination with global interconnection
  • Recognition of care and community work as valid contribution
  • Institutional support without institutional dependency

From Failure Patterns:

  • Distributed leadership (avoiding founder dependency)
  • Technology-first infrastructure (not paper-based systems)
  • Multiple funding/sustainability mechanisms (avoiding single-point funding failure)
  • Active member recruitment and renewal (addressing aging membership)
  • Cultural work on help-seeking (normalizing receiving as dignified)

The 90/10 Framework Application

Time banks function essentially as prototypes for the Abundant Baseline (90%) of the 90/10 Framework:

  • Services exchanged are primarily everyday needs—errands, transportation, companionship, basic repairs, tutoring
  • Equal valuation works because these services are broadly accessible and learnable
  • The system functions as infrastructure for mutual support, not competitive achievement

The time bank model is less suited to the Frontier of Significance (10%):

  • Highly specialized breakthrough work requires different incentive structures
  • Interstellar mission planning, consciousness research, and life extension need accumulated expertise that equal hourly valuation doesn’t incentivize
  • The Mission Credit system proposed for the Frontier can learn from time banking’s principles while incorporating different valuation mechanisms

From Hours to Merit: The Evolution

Time banks represent an evolutionary stepping stone:

Time Bank Merit System
Local networks Global infrastructure
Paper or basic digital tracking Blockchain/distributed ledger
Volunteer coordination AI-assisted matching
Hour-based credits Multidimensional contribution recognition
Informal reputation Proof-of-Diversity verified value
Isolated experiments Integrated civilization design

The merit system doesn’t replace time banking—it learns from it, digitizes it, scales it, and integrates it into a comprehensive framework for post-scarcity coordination.

Practical Implementation Guide

For communities interested in establishing time banks as precursors to broader merit-based systems, here is a practical roadmap drawn from decades of operational experience.

Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-3)

Build Your Core Team

  • Gather 5-10 committed founders who understand time banking principles
  • Ensure diversity in skills, networks, and availability
  • Designate at least one person to serve as time broker (coordinator)
  • Establish decision-making processes and conflict resolution procedures

Research and Planning

  • Study existing time banks (hOurworld.org, Timebanking UK, TimeBanks.org offer resources)
  • Contact successful time banks for advice (most are generous with guidance)
  • Determine your geographic scope and target community
  • Identify potential partner organizations (churches, schools, community centers, social services)

Legal and Administrative Setup

  • Determine organizational structure (informal network, hosted project, or independent nonprofit)
  • Establish basic policies: membership requirements, exchange procedures, dispute resolution
  • Consider liability and insurance implications
  • Research any applicable local regulations

Phase 2: Infrastructure (Months 2-4)

Technology Platform Selection

  • hOurworld’s Time and Talents: Free* for small time banks, most widely used globally
  • Community Weaver: Timebanking UK’s platform
  • Custom solutions: For larger or specialized implementations

Key features needed:

  • Member profiles with skill inventories
  • Request/offer posting system
  • Credit tracking and balances
  • Communication tools
  • Reporting and analytics

Physical Infrastructure

  • Identify a visible meeting location (community center, library, church)
  • Create promotional materials (flyers, website, social media presence)
  • Design your exchange documentation (simple record-keeping forms)

Phase 3: Launch (Months 4-6)

Seed the Network

  • Start with 15-30 founding members minimum
  • Ensure diverse skill representation
  • Conduct orientation sessions explaining principles and procedures
  • Create initial “offers” inventory

Hold a Launch Event

  • Public kick-off celebration
  • Skills showcase where members demonstrate offerings
  • Media outreach for local coverage
  • Partnership announcements with supporting organizations

Facilitate First Exchanges

  • Actively match early exchanges (don’t wait for organic discovery)
  • Follow up on every transaction to ensure quality
  • Document and share success stories
  • Address problems quickly before they become patterns

Phase 4: Growth and Sustainability (Ongoing)

Member Development

  • Regular new member orientations (monthly or quarterly)
  • Social events that build relationships beyond transactions
  • Skills workshops where members teach each other
  • Recognition programs for active participants

Coordinator Sustainability

  • Rotate coordination responsibilities if volunteer-based
  • If possible, secure funding for part-time paid coordinator
  • Build redundancy (no single person should be indispensable)
  • Document all procedures so knowledge isn’t lost when people leave

Quality Assurance

  • Regular member surveys
  • Feedback mechanisms after exchanges
  • Mediation procedures for disputes
  • Standards for specialized services (childcare, repair work, etc.)

Financial Sustainability

  • Member dues (typically minimal, $10-25/year)
  • Grants from foundations supporting community development
  • Partnerships with local government social services
  • Earned income from training other communities

Key Success Factors

Research identifies these factors as critical:

  1. Supportive Host Organization: A church, community center, or social service agency providing space and administrative support
  2. Dedicated Coordinator: At least part-time attention to matching, outreach, and troubleshooting
  3. Visible Location: Physical presence in the community increases trust and participation
  4. Clear Geographic Scope: Defined neighborhood or community boundary
  5. Links to Local Sector: Connections with existing community organizations
  6. Patience: Successful time banks typically take 2-3 years to reach sustainable scale

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Starting Too Big: Begin with a manageable scope; expand gradually
  2. Neglecting Coordination: The “if we build it, they will come” approach fails; active facilitation is essential
  3. Founder Dependency: Build distributed leadership from the start
  4. Ignoring Technology: Paper-based systems don’t scale
  5. Forgetting Sustainability: Plan for coordinator succession and funding transitions from day one
  6. Expecting Rapid Growth: Time banks grow through relationship-building, not viral expansion

Connection to Broader Vision

Time banks serve as practical laboratories for merit-based economies. Each successful exchange proves that humans can coordinate contribution outside market mechanisms. Each challenge reveals design problems that larger systems must solve.

For communities aligned with the Unscarcity vision, establishing a time bank provides:

  • Direct experience with non-monetary coordination
  • A nucleus of people practiced in reciprocal exchange
  • Real data on what works in your specific community
  • Infrastructure that can eventually integrate with broader Merit Systems
  • Proof-of-concept that shifts local conversation about what’s possible

Conclusion: The Path Forward

Time banking represents four decades of experimentation with perhaps the most fundamental question of post-scarcity economics: can humans coordinate valuable contribution without money as the medium of exchange?

The answer from 4+ million documented hours across 30+ countries is a qualified yes. Time banks work—within limits. They flourish when:

  • Coordination is actively maintained
  • Technology supports efficient matching
  • Community relationships underpin transactions
  • Geographic scope is appropriately bounded
  • Multiple pathways to sustainability exist

They struggle when:

  • Founders depart and aren’t replaced
  • Funding disappears
  • Technology lags behind expectations
  • Trust requirements block scaling
  • Help-seeking remains stigmatized

For the Unscarcity Project, time banking provides both inspiration and instruction. These experiments prove the premise: humans will contribute to their communities when contribution is recognized, reciprocity is enabled, and coordination is facilitated—even without money. They also reveal the engineering challenges: coordination costs, trust scaling, specialization incentives, and infrastructure requirements.

The transition from time banking to a comprehensive Merit System requires:

  1. Digitization: Moving from local, often paper-based systems to global digital infrastructure
  2. Integration: Connecting isolated experiments into networked mutual support
  3. Verification: Implementing Proof-of-Diversity and other mechanisms to ensure quality and prevent gaming
  4. Specialization Accommodation: Designing distinct recognition systems for baseline services (equal valuation) and frontier achievements (differentiated recognition)
  5. Cultural Evolution: Normalizing both giving and receiving as dignified participation

Time banks haven’t changed the world—yet. But they’ve changed the lives of hundreds of thousands of participants, demonstrated that alternatives to market coordination exist, and provided invaluable lessons for those designing the economies of abundance.

The hour you spend helping your neighbor has value. Time banking proved that. The Merit System aims to make that recognition universal.

References

On this page