Silicon Valley's Answer to AI Job Loss Is a Check. The New York Times Spent a Year Watching One Land, and It Bought Diapers, Laundry and a Day at Six Flags
About This Episode
The New York Times reported on October 12 that it followed Bay Area guaranteed-income recipients for more than a year, as Musk, Altman and Amodei promote basic income as the fix for AI-driven job losses. Mikole Weeks, a part-time house cleaner in Santa Cruz, got $1,330 a month for a year; the headline tallies softer diapers, clean laundry and a trip to Six Flags, and the Times says it 'did not turn out to be quite that simple'. Google has quietly funded six such pilots since 2022 with a $50 million gift, each capped by tax law in length and amount.
Our Take
Silicon Valley's answer to the jobs it is automating is a check, and the New York Times just spent a year watching what a check does: it buys diapers and a day at Six Flags, it does not replace the job, and the men promising it (Musk at the White House, Bezos on Fox News) are the ones cutting the jobs.
Continue Reading on Unscarcity
Three Other Floors: Why Nordic, UBI, and Singapore Still Need Wages
Direct match: the article's reading of the guaranteed-income evidence (relief in year one, the fade in years two and three, cash as necessary but insufficient once the wage itself disappears) is the frame for what a year of free money in Santa Cruz did and did not fix.
Musk Says AI Brings 'Universal High Income.' Here's the Math.
Direct match: the article dissects the Musk 'universal high income' pitch the NYT story hangs on, and its who-writes-the-check and cash-in-scarcity-markets questions apply to Bezos's three-day-week promise too; the billionaires are asserting the check will work, not asking for any apparatus, so this is a lens, not a mechanism.